Waktu Hari ini
Statistics
OS: Linux mPHP: 5.2.9
MySQL: 5.0.92-community-log
Time: 02:59
Caching: Disabled
GZIP: Enabled
Members: 59
News: 151
Web Links: 9
Visitors: 71595
Syndicate
| SPIRITUALITY WITHOUT GOD |
|
|
|
| Written by Aripin Tambunan | ||||||||
| Saturday, 26 September 2009 | ||||||||
Page 6 of 6
Spirituality without the Religion, is it possible? Looking at above discussion, and then, the spirituality is not possible without the God. Because the spirituality without the God, it implied the spirituality without the spirit. If it is recognized the existence of the human being spirit (in this case is the substantive spirit, it is not the spirit with function/mental or soul), so the spiritual must related to the God (have God). Why? Because the human being spirit come from the God. Because the human being cannot be presented in this world without the existence of the spirit which is blown to him. Because there is nothing the materials in this world which can create it self to become the life creature, at most materials changed to become the energy (E = MC2). Or as far as the existing science to day, it cannot able to create the materials to become the life creature. Thus, there must be existed the spirit to give the life to the materials (body) in order to become the life creature (human beings). If the spirit must be in existence to give the life in order that materials can be the life creature, so the mind is opened about the existence of spirit world. Except for, if the sciences have shown that the materials can become the life creature without there must be existed the spirit. If the existence of spirit world is received, so the mind is opened about the existence of the spirit of creator which create the spirits. If the spirit that give the life to materials come from the spirit of creator, that is the God, so the spirituality must have the God; it is possible without the God. Advantage of the spirituality with the God Some advantages of the spirituality with the God can be described as following: First, there is a sound standard for the spirituality it self. This standard, of course, is based on nature of the God moral law[16] it is not based on the nature of the human being moral law or the place in which the human being is existing. Thus, the measurement of spirituality of someone must be measured on the based of the God moral law. Second, It is possible the existence of difference clearly between the someone who has the good spirituality with someone who has no the spirituality, both when he life in this world or in the world in the future.[17] Third, the spirituality must have the single person who is paid homage, worship, feared and respected, as a place of base and reference for the measurement of the spirituality it self. It there is no the single person such that, the spirituality became absurd and meaning less. That is why, the God must be placed as the standard and reference for spirituality in order that the spirituality became clear and meaning full. Conclusion The spirituality is not possible without the God, cause there will be not existed the measurement or standard clearly for the spirituality if without the God. And it is useless someone has the spirituality in this world, if without the God, because among the people who have the good spirituality and they have a bad spirituality, there is no the difference. All of them will and in the non existence home and there is no different with animals. [1] He is a leading phylosopher of France. He had became a professor of phylosophy in the Sarbonne University, Paris. He is the follower of Catolic Christent up to 18 years old, and later he changed to become atheis and refused hisself is called an agnostic (both not justified nor refused the existence of God) [2] God is postulated as Most Highest Form, Most Perfect Form. [3] Anything occurred in this world have a cause, and if it is traced continuously, it will be arrived on the first cause. And the firt or ultimate cause is the God. [4] The God that placed Its laws in the nature, so that the nature is existent in such that conditions, such as, for example, gravity law. [5] Designing argumentation: There is the designer of world, who designed this world that such form so that the human being can live in it’s thin. [6] Moral argumentation is very varieties, one of them is one will not exist a wrong or right, if the God is not existent. [7] Similar such as the existence of the human being, it is not depended on other persons or the environ in where he or she is exist but it is depended on his or herself-if it is too excessive to say the existence of the human being depended on the God. [8] Science with analytical is the result of analysis. [9] Apriori is the science that is not depended on the existence of the experiences or it is exist before the experience. [10] Science with sintatic is the result of the condition that unified two thing that usually they separated. [11] Science with a posteriori occurred as the result effect of experience. [12] Epistemology is the science which learn how the man to justified the science or his belive. Thus, the problem in epistemology is a justification or it can be said “How do we know we know?” It is the using of ratio. [13] Metaphysics discuss what is exist aside the physics matters. And, in fact, the core of philosophy is to search what is exist be hind the physics nature that we observed dayly. Using the supra ratio side. [14] Post reality is the reality with the existence potential. Aristoteles explained that there is four the cause to occur the reality with the existence potential, they are: first, causa formalis (as the materials to prepare), cause finalis (the aim that become a ward of a form), causa effeciens (motor of drive), causa materialis (materials of thing). If it is suitable to Aristoteles formula, soul is the reality with the existence potential, because its causa materialis is the body, its causa efficient is the spirit, it causa formalis is the form of the human being, causa finalis is the human being who has the soul (emotion, desire of ratio) see copleston, 1993: 306-307). [15] See 1 Corintus 2, 11 [16] What is the nature of this the God moral law can be seen in Aripin Tambunan, Masyarakat dan Kota dalam Perspektif Teosofi, Jurnal Transformasi 4 (1): 45-60. [17] If the existence of the future world is refused, there must be refused olso the existence of spirit world. If the spirit world is refused, the human beings as the life creature that can think, and so on, olso must be refused. Thus, rejection on the future world implied the refused on the existence of the human being as the rational life creature. |
||||||||
| Last Updated ( Tuesday, 24 August 2010 ) | ||||||||
| < Prev | Next > |
|---|
